Related%20passage for Eruvin 191:14

ודילמא סבר לה

Now, since according to the view of the first Tanna the night is a proper time for the wearing of tefillin,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' From which it is obvious that he does not apply Ex. XIII, 10 (which excludes the nights as well as Sabbaths and festivals) to the commandment of tefillin but to that of the Passover.');">⁴³</span> Sabbath also must be a proper time for the wearing of tefillin. But is it not possible that he holds that the night is a proper time for tefillin<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Since he applies Ex. XIII, 10, to the Passover and not to tefillin.');">⁴⁴</span> but that the Sabbath nevertheless is not a time for it, since we have in fact heard R'Akiba to state that the night is a time for the tefillin and that the Sabbath is not?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' As was deduced supra from Ex. XIII, 9.');">⁴⁵</span> - It<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The first ruling in our MISHNAH:');">⁴⁰</span> represents rather the opinion of the following Tanna. For it was taught: Michal the daughter of the Kushite<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Sc. Saul who was so described (cf. M.K. 16b) .');">⁴⁶</span> wore tefillin and the Sages did not attempt to prevent her, and the wife of Jonah<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The son of Amittai, the prophet.');">⁴⁷</span> attended<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'was going up to'.');">⁴⁸</span> the festival pilgrimage and the Sages did not prevent her. Now since the Sages did not prevent her it is clearly evident that they hold the view that it<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Tefillin.');">⁴⁹</span> is a positive precept the performance of which is not limited to a particular time.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' But may be performed at all times including the nights. Sabbaths and festivals. Had its performance been limited to particular times women would have been exempt from the duty of keeping it and Michal who would be guilty of adding to the commandments would have been required by the Sages to abandon her practice.');">⁵⁰</span> But is it not possible that he<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The author of this Baraitha.');">⁵¹</span> holds the same view

Explore related%20passage for Eruvin 191:14. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.